Ask early
“Your prescription is being prepared. Part 1 of 2 is available. Receive available items now, or wait for one delivery?” Show an agreed response cutoff.
A proposal for Mossley: repeat requests, clear prescription history, collection and delivery updates—supported by a staff workspace, a driver login and an upgraded website.
Select a perspective, then explore individual concepts. These are discussion mockups, not connected apps.
Review repeat requests, history, arrival updates and collection. Tell us where a phone, paper or staff-assisted option is needed.
Names, references, counts, charges and times are fictional examples. A perspective changes the presentation, not access permissions.
Explain split supply early enough for a useful patient reply—without turning a preference into an automatic pharmacy or route decision.
“Your prescription is being prepared. Part 1 of 2 is available. Receive available items now, or wait for one delivery?” Show an agreed response cutoff.
Apply a valid standing preference and agreed default. No response is not automatically consent to hold or deliver. Check supply, urgency and delivery policy.
Identify physical packages as part 1 of 2 or part 2 of 2, linked to the prescription. Check loaded packages against the authorised round.
If already loaded, staff review a hold request. Acknowledge it, update through an agreed interface and confirm with the driver before treating the stop as removed.
Offer one journey for consenting household members where practical. Group travel while keeping separate identities, permissions, package counts, policies and outcomes. One response cannot silently alter another person’s prescription.
Show revised ETA, current route version and acknowledgement state. Pharmacy-approved changes reconcile with the route system; a patient reply never silently erases a stop.
Request receipt, pharmacy acknowledgement and progress. Prescribing and dispensing depend on approved processes and available interfaces.
Verified app records of prescriptions, parts, dates and times, with controlled access to suitable handover evidence. Imported history depends on authorised sources.
Ready-to-collect message, reference or supported QR/NFC tap, and nominated-carer workflow. A staff-assisted alternative remains.
On My Way, estimated arrival, known charges and permitted responses. The recorded handover, not a notification, determines completion.
Services, bookings, approved advice, patient account and help in one browser experience, reflecting the same authorised app information.
Suitable pharmacy products and co-delivery. Assess stock, picking, payments, returns and margin before claiming purchases fund the round.
Suggested priorities for discussion. This presentation does not declare software implemented or change the approved application architecture.
| Destination | Proposed scope | Evidence to progress |
|---|---|---|
| Core patient experience | Pharmacy identity; secure patient/carer access; repeat acknowledgement; preparation/status; prescription and handover history; collection; help and suggestion box; accessible layouts. | Patient and staff review; agreed identity/release rules and data sources. |
| Bounded delivery pilot | Driver role; before-round checklist; parts and household grouping; early wait/deliver choice; ETA/replies; authorised photos; delays and route reconciliation. | Confirmed route interfaces, versioned changes, permissions and fictional scenario tests. |
| Optional income features | Shop, suitable co-delivery, transparent charges and accounting. | Net contribution after operating costs and staff workload. |
| Voice accessibility | Read status aloud, spoken choices and repeat assistance, confirmation before important actions, text/touch fallback. | Willing-user testing, privacy in shared spaces and misunderstood-speech handling. |
| Multi-pharmacy rollout | Shared core with branch-specific identity, services and policy. Server-enforced separation of patient records and staff/driver permissions. | Successful pilot and repeatable onboarding/support. |
What would make this useful to you? A patients’ suggestion box is part of the proposed app; this page prepares an email draft.
Record role, screen, benefit and importance. Jon reviews product needs; the pharmacist reviews clinical/release implications; the architect reviews system changes when required.
Accepted ideas become traceable requirements and tasks. Return the decision, test result and resolution to contributors. Feedback does not automatically alter approved architecture.
Propose nopCommerce as the commerce foundation, with a store for each pharmacy, shared product capabilities and pharmacy-specific branding and rules. Patient clinical records remain in their authorised system.
A patient could add prepaid delivery credit through an approved payment provider. A supported QR scan or NFC tap could identify the authorised transaction and confirm the pharmacy’s agreed delivery amount.
This is a proposed account and ledger flow, not a live payment facility. A QR code or NFC token alone does not authorise an arbitrary fee.
Illustrative calculation only. No payment or deduction occurs here.
Explore an eco partnership supplying vehicles and a small team taking carefully chosen marketplace or evening takeaway deliveries. Pharmacy service remains the priority. Extra income is a hypothesis, not a break-even promise.
Review the screens, choose the core app and identify one bounded pilot. Discuss route access and the patient app with the appropriate stakeholders.
PharmDel collaboration proposalThis button illustrates a possible action. It has not submitted a request, changed a round or loaded patient evidence.